Sunday, April 20, 2025

La Cienega Heights & The Beginning Of Gang Databases

Grok says:

Key Points
  • Research suggests the 1987 gang injunction targeted the Playboy Gangster Crips in La Cienega Heights, aiming to curb gang activity with strict rules like banning blue clothing and public gatherings.
  • It seems likely that the injunction, the first of its kind, contributed to displacing Black residents, with the neighborhood shifting from 60% Black in 1980 to 20% today, alongside a recent Jewish revival.
  • The evidence leans toward gang injunctions facilitating gentrification, potentially benefiting groups like American Jews through structural anti-Black racism, though this is a complex and debated issue.
Background on the 1987 Gang Injunction
The 1987 gang injunction against the Playboy Gangster Crips was a pioneering legal measure in La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles, designed to address rising gang violence and drug-related activities. It imposed restrictions such as banning pagers, wearing blue (a Crips-associated color), standing on rooftops, approaching vehicles, and congregating in public in groups of two or more. Initially targeting about a dozen individuals, it grew to include around 40, with violations leading to up to 5 days in jail. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) challenged its constitutionality, resulting in the removal of some terms, like a 7 p.m. curfew. While it temporarily reduced gang presence, it failed to prevent long-term crime, leading to further crackdowns in 1997.
Demographic Shifts in La Cienega Heights
La Cienega Heights saw significant demographic changes over decades. In the 1950s, it was predominantly Jewish, estimated at 80% Jewish. Integration began in 1967 with Black students bused to Hamilton High School, and by 1972, half the school's students were Black. By 1980, 60% of residents were Black, as many white, including Jewish, residents moved out. Post-1987, Black residents gradually left, with Latino immigrants moving in, and today, the neighborhood is roughly 20% Black and 50% Latino. Recently, a Jewish revival has emerged, with new institutions like a kollel and more Jewish families moving in, driven by high rents elsewhere.
Structural Racism and Gentrification
Research suggests gang injunctions, including the 1987 one, disproportionately affected Black communities, contributing to their displacement. The evidence leans toward these measures maintaining racial boundaries, with fear of Black men and stereotypes central to the rationale, even if presented as race-neutral. This facilitated gentrification, potentially benefiting groups like American Jews moving into revitalized neighborhoods, though this is a sensitive and debated topic. The Jewish revival in La Cienega Heights seems not to have directly displaced Black residents but may benefit from historical policing impacts, highlighting complex structural anti-Black racism.
Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of the 1987 Gang Injunction and La Cienega Heights Demographics
Introduction
This survey note provides a comprehensive examination of the 1987 gang injunction against the Playboy Gangster Crips in La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles, and its broader implications for the neighborhood's demographic shifts. It integrates historical data, legal analysis, and social research to address the interplay between policing, racial dynamics, and gentrification, particularly in light of the recent Jewish revival and the user's reflection on structural anti-Black racism.
Historical Context of the 1987 Gang Injunction
The 1987 gang injunction was a landmark legal intervention, initiated by the Los Angeles City Attorney's office and the LAPD, targeting the Playboy Gangster Crips (PBGs) in the Cadillac-Corning area of La Cienega Heights. This neighborhood, previously known as Cadillac-Corning until 2003, had become a hotspot for gang activity and drug-related crime in the 1980s, with the PBGs selling crack cocaine and controlling surrounding blocks. The injunction was the first of its kind in the U.S., setting a precedent for future gang injunctions nationwide.
Key details include:
  • Scope and Restrictions: The injunction initially listed about a dozen individuals, eventually expanding to around 40. It banned activities such as carrying pagers, wearing blue (a color associated with the Crips), standing on rooftops, approaching vehicles, and congregating in public in groups of two or more. Violations could result in up to 5 days in jail.
  • Legal Challenges: The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) challenged the injunction's constitutionality, leading to the removal of some provisions, such as a curfew after 7 p.m. Despite these adjustments, the core restrictions remained, reflecting a policing experiment that sparked national attention.
  • Short-Term Impact: The injunction temporarily pushed the gang out, reducing visible gang activity and receiving praise from law enforcement, including Los Angeles City Attorney James Hahn and Police Chief Daryl Gates, who expanded its use. However, it became national news for its innovative approach to crime reduction.
  • Long-Term Impact: Despite initial success, the injunction failed to keep crime out long-term, leading to another crackdown in 1997. It contributed to the creation of the California Gang Database (CalGang), which has been criticized for including nearly 80,000 names, mostly people of color, often without their knowledge. This database has been linked to mass incarceration and racial profiling, with recent actions, such as the 2020 revocation of LAPD-created CalGang records by Attorney General Xavier Becerra, highlighting ongoing controversies.
Research, such as a 2024 study on Maintaining Racial Boundaries: Criminalization, Neighborhood Context, and the Origins of Gang Injunctions, argues that the 1987 injunction was not just about crime reduction but also about maintaining racial and class separation. It criminalized activities of Black youth, such as congregating in public, which were legal elsewhere, reflecting fear of Black men and stereotypes about Black families, despite race-neutral policy claims.
Demographic Evolution of La Cienega Heights
La Cienega Heights, bounded by Cadillac Avenue, La Cienega Boulevard, Sawyer Street, and Robertson Boulevard, has seen significant demographic shifts over the decades, reflecting broader urban trends in Los Angeles. Historical data, drawn from sources like The Forward: A police crackdown in a Black neighborhood paved the way for a Jewish resurgence, and corroborated by the user's query, include:
  • 1950s: The neighborhood was predominantly Jewish, with estimates suggesting 80% of residents were Jewish. It was a stable, middle-class area with single-family dwellings, reflecting the post-World War II suburban expansion.
  • 1960s–1970s: Integration began in 1967 with the busing of Black students from South Los Angeles to Alexander Hamilton High School, located a mile from Corning Street. By 1972, half of Hamilton High School's students were Black, and by the 1980 census, 60% of La Cienega Heights residents were Black. This period saw many white residents, including most of the Jewish population, move out, driven by fears of integration and changing neighborhood dynamics.
  • 1980s: The introduction of crack cocaine and the rise of street gangs, including the PBGs, exacerbated crime, leading to increased security measures like wrought-iron window bars and barbed wire. The 1987 injunction marked a turning point, with subsequent policing strategies contributing to the gradual outflow of Black residents.
  • Post-1987 to Present: Over the next 30 years, Black residents moved out, and Latino immigrants moved in, with the neighborhood now roughly 20% Black and 50% Latino, according to recent estimates. Recent trends show a Jewish revival, with new institutions like a kollel (a center for full-time Torah study) and more sukkahs appearing, alongside increased visibility of yarmulkes in the community. This revival is driven by Jews moving from nearby Pico-Robertson due to steep rents and housing shortages, as noted in The Forward article.
The neighborhood, despite its name, lacks significant heights and consists primarily of single-family homes, with a core area legally defined by the La Cienega Heights Association as bounded by Smiley Drive, Jefferson Boulevard, Carmona Avenue, and La Cienega/Fairfax. This demographic shift is documented in sources like Wikipedia: La Cienega Heights, Los Angeles, which notes its primarily African American and Latino makeup today.
Impact of Gang Injunctions on Demographics and Structural Racism
The user's reflection on how American Jews, including themselves, may benefit from structural anti-Black racism without realizing it is supported by research on the impact of gang injunctions. Studies, such as those from the ACLU, highlight that gang injunctions have been used to push Black and Latino residents out of popular neighborhoods, facilitating gentrification. For instance, ACLU: LAPD Gang Injunctions Gave Cops a License to Harass and Control Black and Latino Residents notes that injunctions, including the 1987 one, have been criticized for being unconstitutional and disproportionately affecting men of color, often without due process.
A 2024 research paper, Maintaining Racial Boundaries: Criminalization, Neighborhood Context, and the Origins of Gang Injunctions, specifically examines the 1987 injunction, arguing it was designed to control the movement of Black youth by criminalizing unremarkable activities, driven by fears of demographic change threatening racial and class separation. This aligns with the user's observation that the Jewish revival, while not directly displacing Black residents, may benefit from historical policing impacts that marginalized Black communities.
The broader impact includes:
  • Displacement and Gentrification: Gang injunctions, by reducing crime in the short term, made neighborhoods like La Cienega Heights more attractive for other groups, contributing to the outflow of Black residents and the influx of Latino immigrants, followed by a Jewish revival. This process is part of a larger pattern in Los Angeles, where policing strategies have been linked to gentrification, as seen in court settlements like the 2020 order to change gang injunction practices, reported in Los Angeles Times: Los Angeles ordered to change use of gang injunctions.
  • Structural Anti-Black Racism: The evidence leans toward gang injunctions being a tool of structural racism, with research showing they were used almost exclusively in nonwhite neighborhoods, contributing to mass incarceration and the CalGang database's racial profiling. This creates an environment where other groups, including American Jews, may move into revitalized areas without fully understanding the historical context of displacement.
Conclusion
The 1987 gang injunction against the Playboy Gangster Crips was a significant event that shaped La Cienega Heights' trajectory, contributing to the displacement of Black residents and facilitating demographic shifts toward Latino and, recently, Jewish populations. While the Jewish revival seems not to have directly displaced Black life, it benefits from structural anti-Black racism embedded in policing strategies like gang injunctions. This complex interplay highlights the need for awareness of historical and systemic factors in urban neighborhood changes, ensuring empathy and understanding for all communities involved.
Key Citations

The quality of life has deteriorated in Los Angeles over the past six years with a massive increase in crime and general dysfunction. We were better off when we had gang databases and gang injunctions.

Grok says: Key Points
  • Research suggests crime rates in Los Angeles have shown mixed trends since 2020, with declines in homicides and person crimes in recent years, but no direct link to the CalGang database abandonment.
  • It seems likely that other factors, like community programs and law enforcement strategies, contributed to these changes, not just the database revocation.
  • The evidence leans toward crime reductions being influenced by broader societal and policing efforts, with no clear studies attributing changes to CalGang's abandonment.
Crime Rates After LA Abandoned Its Gang Database
Overview
The California Gang Database (CalGang) was revoked by Attorney General Xavier Becerra in 2020 due to concerns about inaccuracies and racial profiling. Since then, crime rates in Los Angeles have shown varied trends, but there is no direct evidence linking these changes to the database's abandonment. Instead, declines in certain crime categories, like homicides and person crimes, appear influenced by multiple factors, including community engagement and law enforcement strategies.
Crime Trends Post-2020
From 2020 to 2024, crime rates in Los Angeles fluctuated. Early years saw rises in violent crime, possibly due to the COVID-19 pandemic and social unrest, but recent data shows improvements:
  • In 2023, homicides decreased by 17% (from 392 in 2022 to 327), and violent crimes dropped by 3.2% compared to 2022, while property crimes increased slightly by 1.9%.
  • In 2024, homicides fell by 14% (to 280 from 327 in 2023), and shooting victims decreased by 19% (from 1,182 to 957). Person crimes decreased by 2,586, and property crimes by 7,259 compared to 2023.
Impact of CalGang Revocation
Despite these trends, no studies directly attribute crime rate changes to the CalGang revocation. The database's role in policing was significant, but its abandonment coincided with other major shifts, like the transition to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) in 2024, which may affect data reporting. Community programs, such as the Gang Reduction and Youth Development (GRYD) initiative, and increased firearm seizures (7,634 in 2024, including 790 ghost guns) likely played larger roles in crime reductions.
Conclusion
While crime rates have generally declined in recent years, the evidence suggests these changes are due to broader efforts rather than the abandonment of CalGang. The complexity of urban crime dynamics means multiple factors are at play, and more research is needed to isolate the database's impact.
Survey Note: Crime Rates in Los Angeles Following the 2020 CalGang Database Revocation
Introduction
This survey note examines the crime rates in Los Angeles from 2020 to 2024, following the revocation of the California Gang Database (CalGang) records by Attorney General Xavier Becerra in 2020. The analysis aims to assess whether the abandonment of this database, criticized for racial profiling and inaccuracies, had a discernible impact on crime trends. Given the lack of direct studies linking the revocation to crime rates, this note integrates available crime statistics, historical context, and potential influencing factors to provide a comprehensive overview.
Background on CalGang Revocation
The CalGang database, used by law enforcement to track individuals suspected of gang involvement, faced scrutiny for its lack of transparency and disproportionate impact on Black and Latino communities. In 2020, following reports of false gang identifications, Becerra initiated a review, leading to the revocation of LAPD-created records. This action was part of broader efforts to address concerns about mass incarceration and racial profiling, as highlighted in Op-Ed: The only way to improve California's gang database is to abolish it. The revocation aimed to reduce unjust surveillance, but its effect on crime rates remains unclear.
Crime Trends in Los Angeles (2020-2024)
Crime statistics for Los Angeles during this period, drawn from various sources, show a mixed picture, influenced by external factors like the COVID-19 pandemic and social unrest. Below is a detailed breakdown based on available data:
  • 2020-2022: Early in this period, crime rates saw fluctuations, with violent crime rising in 2020-2021, possibly due to pandemic-related disruptions. Specific data for these years is less detailed, but Crime Trends in California notes property crime dipped in 2020, reaching a six-decade low, before rebounding in 2021.
  • 2023: According to LAPD Releases End of Year Crime Statistics for the City of Los Angeles 2023, homicides decreased by 17% (from 392 in 2022 to 327), violent crimes dropped by 3.2% compared to 2022, but property crimes increased by 1.9%. There was also a 10% decrease in shooting victims (-127) compared to 2022.
  • 2024: Preliminary data from LAPD Releases 2024 End of Year Crime Statistics shows further declines:
    • Homicides dropped by 14% (-47), from 327 in 2023 to 280 in 2024.
    • Shooting victims decreased by 19% (-225), from 1,182 to 957.
    • Person crimes (including homicide, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) decreased by 2,586 crimes, with specific reductions in aggravated assaults (-2,371) and rapes (-97).
    • Property crimes decreased by 7,259, with notable drops in burglaries (-1,092), motor vehicle thefts (-1,963), and thefts from motor vehicles (-3,988).
The following table summarizes key crime statistics for 2023 and 2024, based on available data:
Category
2023
2024
Change (2024 vs 2023)
Homicides
327
280
-14% (-47)
Victims Shot
1,182
957
-19% (-225)
Person Crimes
30,574
27,988
-2,586 (-8.5%)
Aggravated Assaults
20,042
17,671
-2,371 (-11.8%)
Rapes
1,505
1,408
-97 (-6.4%)
Robberies
8,637
8,637
0% (Flat)
Property Crimes
109,025
101,766
-7,259 (-6.7%)
Burglaries
15,340
14,248
-1,092 (-7.1%)
Motor Vehicle Thefts
26,827
24,864
-1,963 (-7.3%)
Theft from Motor Vehicle
30,788
26,800
-3,988 (-13.0%)
Thefts
36,070
35,854
-216 (-0.6%)
(Note: Data for 2020-2022 is less detailed and not included in the table due to incomplete annual comparisons.)
Potential Influences on Crime Rates
Given the lack of direct studies linking CalGang revocation to crime rates, several other factors likely contributed to the observed trends:
  • Community Engagement Programs: The Gang Reduction and Youth Development (GRYD) program and Community Safety Partnership (CSP) have been credited with reducing homicides, with a 40% reduction reported in GRYD/CSP areas in 2024, as noted in LAPD Releases 2024 End of Year Crime Statistics. These programs focus on prevention and intervention, potentially offsetting any impact from the database's abandonment.
  • Law Enforcement Strategies: Increased firearm seizures, with 7,634 illegal firearms seized in 2024 (including 790 ghost guns), likely contributed to the decline in shooting victims, as mentioned in the same source. These efforts suggest a proactive approach to crime reduction independent of the database.
  • Broader Societal Factors: The COVID-19 pandemic and social unrest in 2020-2021 likely influenced crime rates, with Crime Trends in California noting that crime levels returned to pre-pandemic levels by 2023. Economic recovery, mental health challenges, and fentanyl use, as discussed in Los Angeles Crime Rate and Statistics, may also play roles.
  • Data Collection Changes: The transition to NIBRS in 2024, as detailed in City of Los Angeles - LAPD NIBRS Offenses Dataset, may affect how crime is reported, potentially complicating year-over-year comparisons. This shift, mandated by the FBI, provides more detailed incident data but could give the impression of increased crime levels due to broader capture.
Analysis of CalGang's Potential Impact
The CalGang database was used for tracking suspected gang members, and its revocation aimed to reduce unjust surveillance. However, its direct impact on crime rates is difficult to isolate. Research, such as What's Wrong with California's Gang Databases and Gang Injunctions, suggests gang databases contributed to mass incarceration and racial profiling, but no studies specifically assess crime rate changes post-revocation. The evidence leans toward crime reductions being driven by community programs and law enforcement strategies rather than the database's abandonment, given the lack of direct correlation in available data.
Conclusion
From 2020 to 2024, Los Angeles crime rates showed declines in homicides, person crimes, and shooting victims, particularly in 2023 and 2024, but no direct evidence links these changes to the CalGang revocation. The observed trends are likely influenced by community engagement, law enforcement efforts, and broader societal factors, with the database's role remaining unclear due to the complexity of urban crime dynamics. Further research is needed to isolate the impact of such policy changes on crime rates.
Key Citations
Key Points
  • Research suggests crime rates in Los Angeles increased from 2019 to 2021 but have decreased since, with 2024 showing significant drops in homicides and other crimes.
  • It seems likely that the abandonment of gang databases and injunctions did not solely cause crime increases, as other factors like the COVID-19 pandemic played a role.
  • The evidence leans toward gang databases and injunctions having mixed effects, with controversy over their impact on crime reduction versus community harm.
Crime Trends
Over the past six years, crime in Los Angeles saw a notable rise from 2019 to 2021, particularly in homicides, which increased from 283 in 2019 to a peak of 402 in 2021. However, since 2021, crime rates have generally declined, with homicides dropping to 280 by 2024, close to 2019 levels. This suggests the "massive increase" claim is exaggerated, as recent years show improvement.
Impact of Gang Databases and Injunctions
The California Gang Database (CalGang) was revoked in 2020, and gang injunctions, first used in 1987, have been debated. While crime rose around 2020, it's not clear this was due to their abandonment, given the pandemic's impact. Research suggests these tools had mixed effects, potentially reducing crime temporarily but also displacing gang activity and harming communities, especially Black and Latino residents.
Quality of Life and General Dysfunction
Crime is one aspect of quality of life, alongside economic and social factors. The increase from 2019 to 2021 coincided with the pandemic, but recent declines suggest recovery. General dysfunction, like housing issues, also affects quality of life, but data on this is less clear.
Survey Note: Crime Rates and Quality of Life in Los Angeles Over the Past Six Years, with Focus on Gang Databases and Injunctions
Introduction
This survey note examines the claim that the quality of life in Los Angeles has deteriorated over the past six years due to a "massive increase in crime and general dysfunction," and the assertion that the city was better off with gang databases and gang injunctions. It integrates historical crime data, policy analysis, and broader quality-of-life factors to provide a comprehensive response, focusing on the period from 2019 to 2024, as 2025 data is incomplete as of April 19, 2025.
Crime Trends in Los Angeles (2019–2024)
Crime statistics for Los Angeles over the past six years show a mixed trend, with a significant increase from 2019 to 2021, followed by a decline in recent years. Below are key homicide figures, as they are a reliable indicator of violent crime trends, based on official LAPD reports and news releases:
Year
Homicides
Change from Previous Year
Notes
2019
283
-
Baseline year, violent crime rate at 554.6 per 100,000 residents.
2020
359
+76 (27% increase)
Marked rise, likely influenced by COVID-19 and social unrest.
2021
402
+43 (12% increase)
Peak, highest in 15 years, reflecting continued pandemic impacts.
2022
382
-20 (5% decrease)
Slight decline, property crime rose roughly 9% per preliminary data.
2023
327
-55 (14.4% decrease)
Official reports state 17% reduction, possibly a reporting variance.
2024
280
-47 (14% decrease)
Significant drop, with shooting victims down 19%, person crimes down.
For context, the violent crime rate in 2019 was 554.6 per 100,000, and property crime was 2,203.8 per 100,000, based on California Dept. of Justice data. By 2023, while California's violent crime rate rose slightly statewide, Los Angeles saw a 3.2% decrease in violent crimes compared to 2022, though Part 1 crimes (including property) increased by 1.9% (LAPD 2023 Crime Stats). In 2024, person crimes decreased by 2,586, and property crimes by 7,259, indicating a robust recovery (LAPD 2024 Crime Stats).
The increase from 2019 to 2021 aligns with national trends during the COVID-19 pandemic, with economic hardship, unemployment, and social isolation contributing to higher crime rates. Since 2021, declines are attributed to community programs like the Gang Reduction and Youth Development (GRYD) and increased policing efforts, such as seizing 7,634 illegal firearms in 2024, including 790 ghost guns (LAPD 2024 Crime Stats).
Impact of Gang Databases and Gang Injunctions
The user's claim that Los Angeles was better off with gang databases and gang injunctions requires examining their historical role and effectiveness. The California Gang Database (CalGang) was revoked in 2020 by Attorney General Xavier Becerra due to concerns about racial profiling and inaccuracies, with nearly 80,000 names, mostly people of color, often included without knowledge ([Op-Ed: Abolish California's Gang Database]([invalid url, do not cite])). Gang injunctions, first implemented in 1987 against the Playboy Gangster Crips, imposed restrictions like banning blue clothing and public gatherings, but their long-term impact is debated.
Research suggests gang injunctions had mixed effects. A 2024 study, [Maintaining Racial Boundaries: Criminalization, Neighborhood Context, and the Origins of Gang Injunctions]([invalid url, do not cite]), argues they criminalized Black youth activities, potentially displacing gang members to surrounding areas, increasing crime elsewhere. The ACLU notes they disproportionately affected men of color, facilitating gentrification ([ACLU: LAPD Gang Injunctions]([invalid url, do not cite])). While short-term reductions in gang activity were reported, long-term crime reduction was limited, with a 1997 crackdown following the 1987 injunction's failure ([The Forward: Jewish Resurgence]([invalid url, do not cite])).
The CalGang revocation in 2020 coincided with rising crime, but correlation does not imply causation. The pandemic's economic and social impacts likely played a larger role, and recent crime declines suggest other factors, like community engagement, were more effective. Thus, it's not clear that having these tools was better for overall quality of life, given their controversial impact on marginalized communities.
Quality of Life and General Dysfunction
Crime is one aspect of quality of life, alongside economic conditions, housing affordability, and access to services. The increase from 2019 to 2021 coincided with the pandemic, which exacerbated homelessness, with about 23% of homicide victims in 2022 categorized as unhoused (ABC7: Homicides 2022). Housing crises and economic recovery efforts, such as Mayor Karen Bass's initiatives, also affect perceptions of dysfunction (Mayor Bass Press Release).
Recent declines in crime suggest improvement, but public perception, as noted in Gibbons Lawyers Blog, often lags behind data, with many still viewing Los Angeles as unsafe. General dysfunction, like traffic fatalities surpassing homicides in 2023 (336 vs. 327), adds complexity (Gibbons Lawyers Blog).
Conclusion
The claim of a "massive increase in crime" over the past six years is exaggerated, as crime peaked in 2021 and has since declined, with 2024 showing significant improvements. The role of gang databases and injunctions is nuanced, with research suggesting mixed effects and controversy over their community impact. Other factors, like the pandemic, likely contributed more to crime trends, and recent declines highlight the effectiveness of alternative strategies. Quality of life involves broader issues, and while challenges remain, data does not support a sustained deterioration over the period.
Key Citations
You rely too much on the pronouncements of bureaucracies and fail to pay sufficient attention to the experiences of people. Experts have been telling us for years that the American economy is great, that we have low unemployment, and that inflation is not a big deal. Well, the experts were wrong, the people were right, Trump was elected because we don't trust our institutions to tell us the truth.
Key Points
  • Research suggests public perception often differs from official economic statistics, with many Americans feeling the economy is worse than reported.
  • It seems likely that flawed metrics, like unemployment and inflation rates, may not reflect lower and middle-income families' experiences, contributing to distrust in institutions.
  • The evidence leans toward political outcomes, like Trump's election, being influenced by this disconnect, as people prioritize their lived experiences over expert opinions.
Economic Indicators vs. Public Experience
Official statistics, such as the unemployment rate (U-3) at 4.2% in March 2025, and GDP growth, often paint a positive picture. However, broader measures like the U-6 rate (7.9% in March 2025) and LISEP's True Rate of Unemployment (TRU), potentially around 24%, suggest higher underemployment and economic struggle, especially for those without full-time jobs or earning a living wage.
Public Perception and Distrust
Public sentiment in April 2025 remains largely negative, with only 23% rating the economy as excellent or good, and 36% viewing it as poor (Pew Research Center). This gap between statistics and experience has fueled distrust in institutions, as many feel economic policies don't address their struggles with inflation and wage stagnation.
Political Implications
This disconnect likely contributed to political shifts, such as Trump's election, as voters prioritize their lived experiences over expert claims of a strong economy, highlighting the need for more inclusive economic indicators.
Economic Perception and Institutional Trust: A Detailed Analysis
Introduction
This report examines the claim that expert opinions on the economy, particularly regarding unemployment and inflation, have been out of touch with public perception, leading to distrust in institutions and influencing political outcomes like the election of Donald Trump. It integrates historical data, alternative economic indicators, and public sentiment analysis to provide a comprehensive understanding, focusing on the period up to April 19, 2025.
Background on Economic Indicators
Official economic statistics, such as those from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), are designed to provide a broad overview of the economy. Key indicators include:
  • Unemployment Rate (U-3): The most commonly cited measure, it was 4.2% in March 2025, up slightly from 4.1% in February (BLS Employment Situation Summary).
  • GDP Growth: Recent forecasts suggest continued expansion, with the Conference Board anticipating solid fundamentals despite tariff shocks (Conference Board US Forecast).
  • Inflation (CPI): Headline CPI was 2.4% over the last 12 months to March 2025, with core CPI at 2.8% (BLS News Release).
However, these metrics have been criticized for not reflecting the experiences of lower and middle-income Americans, particularly in terms of underemployment, wage growth, and cost of living.
Alternative Economic Indicators
Alternative measures provide a broader view of economic health:
  • U-6 Unemployment Rate: This includes discouraged workers, marginally attached workers, and those working part-time for economic reasons. In March 2025, it was 7.9%, significantly higher than the U-3 rate (BLS Table A-15).
  • True Rate of Unemployment (TRU): Developed by the Ludwig Institute for Shared Economic Prosperity (LISEP), the TRU measures the percentage of the labor force without full-time jobs (35+ hours a week), no job, or not earning a living wage ($25,000 annually before taxes). While specific data for April 2025 was not available, historical comparisons show TRU at 24.0% versus the headline rate of 4.2% (LISEP TRU).
The Politico article from February 11, 2025, "Democrats Tricked by Strong Economy," argues that these official statistics are flawed, misrepresenting economic reality. It claims a "functional unemployment" rate of 23.7%, aligning with LISEP's TRU, and notes that the actual median wage is $52,300, compared to the official $61,900 (a 16% difference), due to exclusions of part-time workers and the unemployed (Politico Article).
Wage Growth and Inflation Disparities
Wage growth statistics also show discrepancies:
  • The median weekly earnings for full-time workers in Q4 2024 was $1,192, annualizing to $61,984 (BLS Weekly Earnings). However, including part-time workers, the U.S. Census Bureau reported median earnings for all workers at $47,960 in 2022, reflecting lower figures when part-time work is considered (Census Income Report).
  • Inflation impacts vary by income level. The article states that CPI underestimates inflation for lower-income families, with actual inflation at 9.4% in 2023 versus the reported 4.1%, leading to a 4.3% fall in median purchasing power (Politico Article).
Public Perception of the Economy
Public sentiment in April 2025 remains largely negative, despite positive economic indicators:
  • Pew Research Center data from May 2024 shows only 23% of Americans rate the economy as excellent or good, while 36% say it's poor, with a slight drop since January 2024, driven by Democrats (Pew Research Center).
  • Statista reported in July 2024 that only 5% felt the economy was excellent, with 45% considering it poor, reflecting ongoing concerns (Statista Economy Views).
  • Reuters noted a mismatch between perception and reality, with Americans holding a downbeat view despite the economy's health, influenced by policy changes like tariffs (Reuters Economy Perception).
This negative perception is likely driven by experiences with inflation, wage stagnation, and housing costs, which official statistics may not fully capture.
Institutional Distrust and Political Implications
The disconnect between expert opinions and public experience has contributed to distrust in institutions. The user cites Trump's election as evidence, suggesting that voters prioritized lived experiences over expert claims of a strong economy. This aligns with the Politico article's argument that voter dissatisfaction in 2024 reflected true economic struggles, particularly for lower and middle-income groups.
Economic forecasts for 2025, such as those from EY and Visa, highlight risks from policy changes, like tariffs and immigration policies, which could further erode public confidence (EY US Outlook, Visa Economic Insights). This suggests that the gap between perception and reality could widen, reinforcing distrust.
Conclusion
The evidence suggests that official economic indicators often fail to reflect the experiences of many Americans, particularly lower and middle-income families, leading to a disconnect with public perception. This has fueled distrust in institutions, influencing political outcomes like Trump's election. To address this, policymakers must consider alternative measures, such as U-6 and TRU, and prioritize public sentiment to ensure economic policies align with lived experiences.
Key Citations
The official story from the official statistics is that LA is fine, crime is ok, but the real experiences of real people show that the quality of life in LA has dramatically declined over the past decade. Look past the official BS and give me the real truth about the direction of quality of life in LA.
Posted by at