DON'T LET SHALHEVET DREAM DIE -- KEEP THE FLAME ALIVE

AS MANY OF YOU MAY ALREADY KNOW, THE SHALHEVET EARLY CHILDHOOD, ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS ANNOUNCED LAST WEEK THAT THEY MUST CLOSE THEIR DOORS AT THE END OF THIS SCHOOL YEAR DUE TO FINANCIAL DIFFICULTY. THIS SUDDEN ANNOUNCEMENT HAS BEEN DEVASTING FOR SO MANY OF US - OUR CHILDREN, TEACHERS, STAFF, PARENTS/FAMILIES, COMMUNITY, ETC.

THERE IS NO OTHER SCHOOL LIKE SHALHEVET IN LOS ANGELES. IT IS TRULY A MAGICAL PLACE. AND WE, THE PARENTS, ARE WORKING DILIGENTLY TO RAISE MONEY TO KEEP THE SCHOOL OPEN. HOWEVER WE CAN'T DO THIS WITHOUT YOUR SUPPORT. MOST SHALHEVET FAMILIES ARE CONTRIBUTING $1000.00.

WE REALIZE THE LAST YEAR+ HAS BEEN EXTREMELY DIFFICULT FINANCIALLY FOR MOST, IF NOT ALL, AND WOULD NOT ASK UNLESS WE WERE IN SUCH A DESPERATE SITUATION, BUT WE HUMBLY ASK FOR YOUR HELP.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE ARE ON A VERY TIGHT DEADLINE AND NEED TO KNOW WHAT, IF ANYTHING, YOU ARE COMMITTED TO DONATE BEFORE PASSOVER.

PLEASE PASS ALONG TO ANYONE YOU THINK WOULD BE WILLING AND/OR ABLE TO HELP, I.E. PARENTS, SIBLINGS, NEIGHBORS, COWORKERS, ETC.

THANK YOU SO VERY, VERY MUCH!

MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO "SAVE SHALHEVET SCHOOL". YOU CAN MAIL THEM TO ME AT:

1940 S. CREST DR., LA, CA, 90034 OR I WILL PICK THEM UP AT YOUR CONVENIENCE.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP. THANK YOU FOR OUR CHILDREN AND THE FUTURE OF THE BEST SCHOOL IN LOS ANGELES.

Gay Rabbis Night Hosted By Jewish Journal

Luke Ford says:

Why would clergy, of all people, want to go public with their sexual preferences?

I am a humble blogger. I have no responsibilities. But you don’t see me tearing up the blogosphere talking about my sexual orientation. You don’t read long horny blog posts from me discussing what it was like to be a hound dog in Seventh-Adventism, Judaism and the academy.

No, sirree, I believe these matters should be private.

Why would one want to talk to the world about one’s sexual tastes?

This seems particularly inappropriate for clergy. For bloggers and novelists and actors and musicians, fine. But people who are supposed to be moral leaders?

Why would morally serious people want to identify themselves to the world by their taste in sex? So you’re a bloke who likes to bugger other blokes, why preach that from the pulpit?

Everyone I know has particular sexual preferences. Some like to be spanked. Some like it in the context of adultery. Some can’t get excited unless there’s pain. But these people don’t identify themselves to the world by what they like in the bedroom.

Read On

Cornered By A Shiksa

Luke Ford says:

Monica’s “Martinis and Melodrama” cocktail party is called for 7:30 p.m.

I walk up to her door and knock at 7:30 p.m.

I’m the first guest.

Her dog Eliot Epstein barks furiously. Last time I was here, he bit me.

Monica says the right things about putting him in her car for the party but of course she does nothing of the sort and we’re treated to his annoying yaps for the rest of the evening.

I head straight for her dining table and start heaping my plate with tabuli and pasta and humus. I haven’t eaten this well since LimmudLA.

Soon Monica’s two graphic designers show up and the three girls talk about martinis for 30 minutes.

I’m going out of my mind. Boring! I hate alcohol. I hate trivial conversation. I want something meaty to sink my fangs into.

Read On

Pacific Union College Pool

Luke Ford says:

One of the ways I classify places is whether or not I ever made it there.

I only ever made it in LA, Sacramento, Orlando, Vancouver, Las Vegas and Big Sur (beside a cliff overlooking the ocean underneath a loving sun).

I never did it in Australia. Never got further than a hearty kiss and some gentle fondling above the belt.

I just reconnected with an old acquaintance from Pacific Union College Elementary School — Rod. He was in the grade below me. He played quarterback. Like me, he had a smart mouth.

I just posted on his Facebook: “Dude, did you get laid in Angwin? I felt like I was the only one who never did… SDA girls were goody girls as far as I found. I was a virgin until I was 22… You were always precocious, playing quarterback…slick with the girls. How old were you when you lost it?”

An old friend responds: “”Luke…the girls weren’t goody girls…they were just smart!!”

I never did anything naughty with a Seventh-Day Adventist girl. I never did anything naughty until I was 22.

(Rod did it first when he was 15.)

The closest to naughty I ever got was the summer of 1983 when a bunch of us got in the hot tub one Shabbos afternoon. There was a girl with us in a bikini (my age, we’d all known her for years). And about five guys.

Read On

When The Loss Comes Rolling In

Luke Ford says:

Most of the time, I’m the happy-go-lucky moral leader you all love and enjoy.

A moral leader for the whole family!

I strike dramatic poses. I say dramatic things. I get into dramatic conflicts. I write out my dramatic feelings.

Oh, it is all such fun. So grand! So childish.

And then the loss comes rolling in. I’ll be silly on my blog, I’ll be clowning on my live cam, and then I realize that I am 43, never married, no children, tenuated ties to others, little community. And that feeling of loss keeps expanding until it weighs down my heart and I just feel hollow inside.

Read On

I Just Want To Be Close To You

Luke Ford says:

I have a hard time sleeping with someone. I feel like it is against the Torah. I feel like I am not living up to my highest ideals. I feel like my dad might walk in any minute and say, “Son, what are you doing?”

So I normally like to kick my ladies to the bottom of the bed and have them sleep at my feet. Then in the morning, when I’m awake, I bring them up for a quick cuddle before I shower and say my prayers.

But there was this one woman who wouldn’t be kicked away so easily.

She was taking Ambien. And she was a very snuggly cuddly girl.

And we’d snuggle and cuddle until I got sleepy — our sex lives had ended weeks before (love of chess extended our relationship by about six months) — and then I push her towards the bottom of the bed.

She didn’t get the hint.

So I grabbed her little feet and dragged her to her rightful place and gave her a comforter and a pillow and told her to rejoice in her lot.

Read On

Seventh-Gay Adventists

Luke Ford says:

That’s a great title for a movie.

I was raised a Seventh-Day Adventist. There were no out homosexuals in the religious communities I grew up in (Avondale College and Pacific Union College). We would’ve dragged them behind a pack of kangaroos until they were cured of their disease.

I remember in sixth, seventh and eighth grade at Pacific Union College Elementary School, “fag” was the dirtiest word you could hurl at someone. I used a lot.

Guess that wasn’t very Christlike of me.

Here’s more info on this movie:

This film explores the complex intersection of religion, identity, and sexuality through the stories of gay Adventists who are often faced with a gut-wrenching decision. They must choose between the church they were raised to believe is God’s true remnant church and their innate desire for an intimate, loving relationship. Or is there a way to reconcile their faith and their identity?

Why Make This Film?

Read On

What Must I Do To Be Saved?

Luke Ford says:

I’m reading a terrific book addressing this question — Freedom to Change by Frank Pierce Jones, a professor of Classics at Brown University and a teacher of Alexander Technique.

From page two: “For the Alexander Technique doesn’t teach you something new to do. It teaches you how to bring more practical intelligence into what you are already doing: how to eliminate stereotyped responses; how to deal with habit and change. It leaves you free to choose your own goal but gives you a better use of yourself while you work towards it.”

“Alexander and his brother, A.R. Alexander (1874-1947), developed a way of using their hands to convey information directly through the kinaesthetic sense. They gave their pupils an immediate “aha” experience of performing a habitual act — walking, talking, breathing, handling objects, and the like — in a non-habitual way. The technique changed the underlying feeling tone of a movement, producing a kinaesthetic effect of lightness that was pleasurable and rewarding and served as the distinguishing hallmark of non-habitual responses.”

Read On

What's Important To You

Luke Ford says:

I often get people emailing in about blog posts and videos I’ve made. They want changes. They have corrections. They think I’ve been unfair. They offer feedback.

What they don’t have, most of the time, is a link to the blog post or video in question.

They don’t realize that the blog post they’ve been worrying about is not on my mind. They act as though what absorbs them absorbs me too.

It doesn’t.

That’s why rules of social engagement are important. When I deal with smart cultured people, they usually include links to what they’re talking about because they’ve been educated that what is important to you is often peripheral to others.

Read On

Finding An Orthodox Wife

Luke Ford says:

LA is weird. Almost all Orthodox high school graduates who are serious about their religion leave town (because there are no full-time learning opportunities in Los Angeles for the unmarried Modern Orthodox).

There are far more male singles in Southern California than female singles (while New York has the opposite ratio). Orthodox guys in LA often fly to New York for shiduchim (finding a spouse).

If you’re not learning at least an hour a day with texts in their original language, you’re a pretend Orthodox Jew. Los Angeles is filled with these. If you’re an Orthodox guy and you’re not married by the time you’re 30, you’re probably using porn, chasing strippers, ordering hookers, bedding down shiksas and complaining you can’t find a religious girl while you daven in Orthodox shuls.

West Coast religion is considerably more watered-down than its Mid-West and East-Coast relatives. It’s more a uniform that you put on and take off when convenient.

Read On

Global Warming

Luke Ford says:

On hour one of his radio show today, Dennis Prager read a snide letter reproving Dennis for talking about “global warming” instead of “climate change.”

Dennis: The mental gymnastic that those of you who continue to believe that carbon dioxide emission from humans will wreak havoc on the planet because of over-heating.

I’m corrected all the time now: “Don’t use the term “global warming.” That was made up by the press. We never use global warming. We use climate change.”

They used “global warming” at the beginning but now the globe isn’t warming, it’s freezing. Remember how they predicted the most horrific hurricanes? We had one of the mildest hurricane seasons ever, but it doesn’t matter. Whenever they are caught in their phony predictions, they move on to new environmentalist religious rhetoric. Truth doesn’t matter.

I want to clarify the chicanery of calling it “climate change” instead of “global warming.”

Let’s say it was climate change. So what? The only thing people care about is global warming.

Give me one good reason for not using the term global warming. Why object? If the world isn’t warming, then there’s no danger, right?

Read On

Finding An Orthodox Wife

Luke Ford says:

A young man converting to Judaism tells me: “The problem I have is that most orthodox women (90% +???) won’t recognize a ger (a convert to Judaism) unless he has an RCA-approved conversion.”

I don’t think that’s true. Unless you want to be chareidi, you’ll be fine in Orthodox life with an LA Beit Din or non-RCA approved conversion to Judaism.

If you do want to be chareidi, getting that initial Orthodox conversion to Judaism, even if it is not approved by the RCA, will make your life 100% easier.

Any Orthodox non-charedi girl who tells you that your LA Beit Din conversion is not good enough is just feeding you a line to get rid of you.

I remember at LimmudLA a man asking about his wife’s conversion status with Rabbi Michael Melchior. The wife had done a non-RCA approved Orthodox conversion to Judaism. Should he worry? Rabbi Melchior told him not to worry.

People worry too much.

Read On

Harry Reid, Barack Obama

Luke Ford says:

On his radio show Jan. 11, 2010, Dennis Prager said about U.S. Senate majority leader Harry Reid’s remarks about Barack Obama being more electable because he was a light-skinned black man who only spoke with a “negro dialect when he wants to”: “I am embarrassed as an American that this is big news.

“I think Harry Reid is one of those who are leading the United States to disaster.”

“I do not care what people say privately. We have started to think that private things muttered to a friend tells us all we need to know about a person… When these writers write these comments, they just make people more wary about opening up to friends and colleagues. It is a self-imposed totalitarianism.

“What is it about totalitarianism that is so frightening? That what you say in private is monitored.”

“The reporting of what people say privately? Tell me why that is different then what the Stasi did in East Germany. Why is this noble? Does it tell you things you need to know about a character?”

Read On

The Startle Response

Luke Ford says:

I’m reading Freedom to Change by Frank Pierce Jones, a professor of Classics at Brown University and a teacher of Alexander Technique.

From page 178: The pattern of startle (which has been studied by high-speed photography) is remarkably regular. It begins with an eye-blink; the head is then thrust forward; the shoulders are raised and the arms stiffened; abdominal muscles shorten; breathing stops and the knees are flexed.

The startle pattern is a model of other slower response patterns: fear, anxiety, fatigue and pain all show postural changes from the norm which are similar to those that are seen in startle. In all of them there is a shortening of neck muscles which displaces the head, and which is usually followed by some kind of flexion response, so that the body is drawn into a slightly smaller space. As in startle these postural responses cannot take place without the prior displacement of the head and the shortening of neck muscles.

Read On

Failed Messiah Scott Rosenberg

Luke Ford says:

Samuel G. Freedman writes in the New York Times:

Leaders of the Chabad movement declined to speak on the record about Mr. Rosenberg, but in general, they say he has exaggerated the degree of messianism in the movement and that he is driven to settle scores. Even they, though, acknowledge he has gotten some embarrassing things right.

“Shmarya often reminds me of journalism in the old days — when editors would sometimes go at one another physically in the street,” Jonathan D. Sarna, a historian of American Jewry at Brandeis University with expertise in Jewish journalism, wrote in an e-mail message. “I know that he is fiercely hated in some Orthodox circles, but he has had many a scoop, and is certainly THE destination for those who want dirt about Orthodoxy exposed to the world.”

There have been a lot of articles written about Shmarya Rosenberg but this is far and away the best one yet. It really gives you a sense of the man, what drives him, and what are his strengths and weaknesses.

The opening of the story is vivid:

Read On

Alexander Technique Happiness

Luke Ford says:

I’m reading a terrific book addressing this question — Freedom to Change by Frank Pierce Jones, a professor of Classics at Brown University and a teacher of Alexander Technique.

Happiness is defined as “doing well something that interests you.” It can be seen at its clearest in a healthy child at play whose pleasure resides in the satisfaction of making something work. This satisfaction, Alexander says, can be established even more strongly when the mechanism that is made to work is the child’s own. Here he describes vividly the change in facial expression and the look of pleasure that a child shows when he suddenly discovers in a lesson that he can do easily and in a coordinated manner something he has always done awkwardly before, realizing, for example, that he can in this way improve his skill in games. “It’s a happiness,” Alexander said, “which increases with the psycho-physical improvement.” In marked contrast is the unhappiness shown by most adults as they approach middle age and realize that they are not improving in themselves but deteriorating. Success is essential to happiness in everyone. When happiness cannot be obtained in the ordinary way, in the satisfaction of using oneself optimally in the routine of everyday life, a person will begin pursuing specific pleasures. People unfortunately have been taught to make the routine activities of daily life automatic and as far as possible unconscious. This leads to a condition of stagnation and the harmful demand for specific excitements and stimulations, none of which can possibly produce real happiness. Such happiness can only be obtained by restoring to a person his own sensory standard so that he can gradually re-establish a pattern of growth and self-satisfaction that will carry him beyond middle age and into old age. Happiness, then, consists in the sensory satisfaction that comes with an increase of self-knowledge and control. This satisfaction extends to all aspects of living (including, of course, the sexual).

Read On

The Upper Classes

Luke Ford says:

I’m reading a terrific book addressing this question — Freedom to Change by Frank Pierce Jones, a professor of Classics at Brown University and a teacher of Alexander Technique.

When happiness cannot be obtained in the ordinary way, in the satisfaction of using oneself optimally in the routine of everyday life, a person will begin pursuing specific pleasures. People unfortunately have been taught to make the routine activities of daily life automatic and as far as possible unconscious. This leads to a condition of stagnation and the harmful demand for specific excitements and stimulations, none of which can possibly produce real happiness. Such happiness can only be obtained by restoring to a person his own sensory standard so that he can gradually re-establish a pattern of growth and self-satisfaction that will carry him beyond middle age and into old age. Happiness, then, consists in the sensory satisfaction that comes with an increase of self-knowledge and control. This satisfaction extends to all aspects of living (including, of course, the sexual).

From page 53:

“The upper classes,” A.R. Alexander once said, “are never any help to you. When one of them discovers the Technique, he never tells anybody else about it. He likes to keep it for himself.” It was different with literary people. They liked to share the knowledge of something they had discovered…

Read On

Big Boy Rules

Luke Ford says:

Despite a stomach bug, I interviewed by phone Washington Post reporter Steve Fainaru Wednesday evening, Jan. 13, 2010, about his 2009 book Big Boy Rules.

Luke: “Tell me about the impact of 9/11 upon you personally and professionally.”

Steve: “It had a profound impact. When it happened, I was in Washington. I was covering sports… That job became immediately obsolete. I was tasked to cover terrorism. It took me to New York. Then the [Iraq] war started and I got caught up in the war for the better part of three years.”

“There were several books I could’ve written about Iraq. This story, both personally and professionally, resonated with me the most… The whole private security madness going on over there, the hidden quality of it, it just made it a rich topic.”

Read On

Alexander Technique & John Dewey

Luke Ford says:

I’m reading a terrific book addressing this question — Freedom to Change by Frank Pierce Jones, a professor of Classics at Brown University and a teacher of Alexander Technique.

From Appendix A: “John Dewey once said that the reason F.M. Alexander’s teaching had appealed to him in the first place was not that it made him feel better (though the improvement in his health had been marked), but that it made him conscious of his total ignorance of a whole field of knowledge. The field he referred to was the knowledge of how he used himself in the ordinary activities of life. Like many intellectuals, Dewey was aware of a certain ineptness in the performance of physical tasks. If he was going to get up from a chair, or sit down, or pick up something he had dropped, he would do it awkwardly, and his aim was to get it over with as quickly as possible so as to get on to something more suited to his abilities, like “thinking.” Alexander made him realize that his impressions and beliefs about his own physical activities were as appropriate a field as any for the exercise of constructive thought.”

Dr. Jones writes about John Dewey: I asked Dewey about his early experiences with the Alexander Technique. He said he had been taken by it first because it provided a demonstration of the unity of mind and body. He thought that the demonstration had struck him more forcibly than it might have struck someone who got the sensory experience easily and quickly, because he was such a slow learner. He had always been physically awkward, he said, and performed all actions too quickly and impulsively and without thought. “Thought” in his case was saved for “mental” activity, which had always been easy for him. (Alexander told me that when Dewey first came to him he was “drugged with thinking” and used to fall asleep during lessons.) It was a revelation to discover that thought could be applied with equal advantage to everyday movements.

Read On

Alexander Technique Lesson

Luke Ford says:

I’m reading a terrific book addressing this question — Freedom to Change by Frank Pierce Jones, a professor of Classics at Brown University and a teacher of Alexander Technique.

From page two: “For the Alexander Technique doesn’t teach you something new to do. It teaches you how to bring more practical intelligence into what you are already doing: how to eliminate stereotyped responses; how to deal with habit and change. It leaves you free to choose your own goal but gives you a better use of yourself while you work towards it.”

“Alexander and his brother, A.R. Alexander (1874-1947), developed a way of using their hands to convey information directly through the kinaesthetic sense. They gave their pupils an immediate “aha” experience of performing a habitual act — walking, talking, breathing, handling objects, and the like — in a non-habitual way. The technique changed the underlying feeling tone of a movement, producing a kinaesthetic effect of lightness that was pleasurable and rewarding and served as the distinguishing hallmark of non-habitual responses.”

Read On

Believe Women?

Luke Ford says:

The rabbinic commentator Ramah said about accusations of adultery that women are believed (if they confess to adultery). The assumption is if the woman says it, it must be true, because it would be too embarrassing to lie about.

That’s no longer true.

Twenty years ago, a public accusation of adultery would end a rabbi’s career. Now people are more skeptical of such charges.

If the rabbi fights back and says it is not true, then people tend to hear him out. If the rabbi quits his job and leaves town, then they tend to believe the accusations of sexual impropriety.

Read On

Love On The Rocks

Donna Burstyn says: So what happens to a blended family when the family doesn’t blend? It’s hard to imagine people raised in different atmosphere getting married. I think it’s more of a miracle that people stay married than not. Given that people grow up in different countries, different cultures, different religions, different viewpoints, different personalities, and usually in the years 20-30, they choose to marry and vow to commit to one another for the rest of their lives, it’s fascinating. Those that stay married to the end are quite remarkable given that life brings so many surprises. People grow and change and want different things. They demand different things at different ages. Life throws some hardballs. Yet there are people who survive as a unit after 50 or 60 years. That’s a miracle given our divorce rate of about 60%.

 

Read On

Charting My Emotions

I want to write out my feelings.

I've been feeling quite discouraged this weekend and then this evening I had a series of breakthroughs.

Let's begin by talking about therapy.

I went back to therapy in October of 2008 because I was being tossed from my shul of the past seven years. I hadn't done anything horrible, the rabbi was simply tired of fielding complaints about me and was looking for an excuse to toss me. Then he seized on one right before Rosh Hashanah and I found I did not have my longtime home for the high holidays.

The rabbi eventually offered me a deal whereby if I changed my ways, shut down Lukeford.net, and did my future blogging under his editorial control, I could return to my shul.

I said no and walked away, but I felt bad. I felt like I had failed him. I had failed that relationship. I had failed in my relationship with my shul. I had failed in my relationships with people at shul because I was not very popular and I guess more people wanted me out than in.

I felt bad. I judge myself by the quality of my relationships and this just seemed like a whole lot of failure on my part.

What made it particularly painful was that I was going through a conversion to Orthodox Judaism at the time and I needed a sponsoring rabbi. All three Modern Orthodox shuls in Pico-Robertson had now tossed me. I felt like a right wally. I feared I would never make it through my Orthodox conversion. That failure would make my adoption of Orthodox Judaism over the past nine years look like a failure.

After my religion (and before any particular shul or rabbi), my highest commitment is to my writing. I wasn't going to let it fall away and fall under the editorial control of somebody else who wasn't paying me.

So I chose my writing freedom. I went on to other shuls and to other rabbis. And I went back to therapy.

I found great support in therapy. I was so scared. I was scared of looking like a fraud as an Orthodox Jew by failing to get through my latest Orthodox conversion attempt (the RCC booted me in 2001, I got admission to an Orthodox conversion program in Sacramento in 1993 but left town before I could get going proper, I was entering one while I was at Aish HaTorah in 1998 but got kicked out of the shul in March and moved instead to the Reform temple Ohr HaTorah). I was scared that I was letting down rabbis and Jews who'd believed in me enough to give me a chance at another Orthodox shul (2001-2008).

I was scared I was a bad person. I was scared that I could not hang on to the important relationships in my life. I was scared I was not worthy of belonging to an Orthodox shul. I was scared I was too dirty for Orthodox friends. I was scared of being isolated, of feeling alone in a big world.

Therapy reassured me. I had my priorities straight. I hadn't backed down when it would've been so easy. I stayed true to the best of my writing.

Then I started dating again in January 2009 and this topic dominated my therapy for the next year.

It waned in significance in October of 2009 as my financial situation worsened. My driving job ended in August (after five months) and my savings plummeted. I failed to think of ways I could pay for my Alexander Technique teacher training. I remember asking advice and guidance from a close friend and though she helped, she also showered me with contempt.

When I told her one day about what I planned to talk about in therapy that week, she said, "Why wouldn't you talk about having to take financial responsibility for the first time in your life?"

I also got contempt for my inability to always rise to the occasion when I was on my back.

I got contempt for my debt load. I got contempt for my back problems. She thought they represented psychological problems. I got contempt for not having better relationships with my family, for not being more independent of them. I got contempt for my ill health.

I felt weak and sick and tired. I felt like I had little to offer a relationship. I was too weak to leave the house most days (after I had fulfilled all my responsibilities).

In the fall of 2009, I started increasingly worrying about my finances. And then a week ago, I solved that problem. I got steady work that I can do from home.

So did my worries go away? Nope. They've just changed. I no longer worry about money. I now worry about my fatigue. For the past two weekends, I haven't left the house. I'm just too tired. I have not been to yoga in two weeks. I wonder when this fog of exhaustion will ever leave.

Friday afternoon, I did a mass upgrade of about 25 plug-ins on my semiologic pro set-up on Lukeford.net. The upgrade got rid of all my text widgets and replaced them with an error message.

I figured I had done something wrong. I felt bad. I looked for computer help from two friends but neither were around. So I tried re-installing semiologic pro and my whole Lukeford.net/blog set-up folded up operation.

I felt helpless at the hands of this unreliable software. I saw myself shelling out $100 again for elementary computer help.

Saturday night, I checked the semiologic pro forum and saw that this problem was not unique to me. It had happened to many other people. It was not my fault.

So my emotion changed from self-loathing and helplessness to anger. And with that emotional change, I got more energy.

Conversation and Community: MyPetPeeves.com Is The Solution We Need

There's a lot of talk about community, a forum for this issue or a message board for that topic. But there's only one site that attracts people of all interests - from politicos to pet lovers, from shoppers to sales mavens - a destination that caters to every need with clarity and excitement: MyPetPeeves.com

The site speaks to the one thing all people share, pet peeves, and transforms frustration into  conversation and helpful dialogue. For example: it's not uncommon to complain about a bad plumber - as a homeowner I know how difficult it is to find a reliable and affordable plumber (or carpenter or electrician) - but the power of MyPetPeeves.com rests in the site's proven ability to find answers. Members will quickly respond with contact names of plumbers in the same area, or offer practical solutions to seemingly impossible problems. 

Best of all, MyPetPeeves.com is easy to use, completely free - you can't beat the price! - and a credible source of information (the topics are virtually limitless) for people who crave answers. Forget gimmicks and distractions, the stuff that (sadly) defines the majority of so-called "informational websites." MyPetPeeves.com is a happy exception: a real community of members throughout the world, all of whom want to help one another by giving friendly advice, answering questions, offering referrals and always being there for an individual in need. That's MyPetPeeves.com. In a word: superb!

Become a fan of MyPetPeeves.com!!!!!

Seeing The End From The Beginning

Luke Ford says:

“You see the end of things right from the beginning,” says his therapist.

He’s jolted. “My previous therapist said that,” he says. “Not the one before you, but the one before the one before you. She said I was always prepared for loss. That I always expected the teat to go dry. That I’d just suck away for all I could get because I felt sure it would go dry.”

“Your writing comes first for you,” says his therapist.

“Yes,” he says. “It’s number one. That makes decision-making easy. Everything else in my life, everyone else in my life, is subordinate to my writing. It doesn’t matter if I am lying in the gutter or davening at shul or standing on a porn set. They are all opportunities to write. Each perspective is but raw material in my artistic hand.

“I’m all about the work. I’m ready to sacrifice everything for my art.”

“That sounds very lonely,” says his therapist.

“Yeah, it can be,” he says. “It’s good to have your priorities.

Read On

Lila Says

Luke Ford says:

I know what you’re thinking. The Moral Leader, he could never relate to a sinner like me. The Leader lives on such a high plane, he’s achieved such a resounding victory over the Satan, he could never understand the struggles of a wicked creature such as myself. The Leader, he lives his life by G-d’s immutable moral law, while I just struggle on, doing the best I can, I’m only flesh and blood.

Please don’t think this way. The Leader understands.

The Leader just watched the French film Lila Says and was deeply shook up.

This film has propelled me to my Bible to look up verses about wanton women and to paste them in between these photos from the film.

According to Wikipedia, the novel Lila Says was first published in France in 1996: “Lila Says is a narrative of the protagonist’s — Chimo, an Arab boy living in France — interactions with a catholic girl named Lila. Lila befriends Chimo and tells him very provocative and somewhat troubling incidents in her life and shares her experiences with him.”

The French film came out in 2004. IMDB

Read On

End Of Jewish Blogging?

Luke Ford says:

I have not noticed a change. When you write something that affects people, you will get feedback and pressure in direct relationship to the importance of what you write. I started getting death threats in 1997.

I found that over the years, people got smarter in how they reacted to me. It became more and more rare for people to call me up to yell at me. People probed for my weaknesses and when they found them, they used them to get back at me.

It’s been many years since people bothered me about my blog. I find that few people are willing to confront me directly. They either reason with me very nicely or they leave me alone.

I’m not married. I don’t have kids. I don’t have one shul that I hold sacred. I don’t have one source of income. I’ve created a life where I can pretty much say what I want on my blog.

Here’s an amusing excerpt from my Jewish Journal profile in 2007: “Multiple rabbis contacted by The Journal declined to comment; not only that, they didn’t even want to be named as having declined comment.”

Heshy Fried of FrumSatire.net talked about this stuff in our recent interview.

John emails: “People don’t mess with you because you fight back hard. Remember that rabbi who is a convert from a few months ago? He kept sending you threatening e-mails and you kept posting them to your blog, making him look increasingly foolish the more he threatened you. That only works if you are willing to alienate the people who are complaining. If you aren’t, you have to balance their concerns with your own prerogative to blog honestly.”

Read On

Seeking Validation

Luke Ford says:

There’s one genre of movies that always turns me on — underdog sports dramas. I love them.

I watched The Rookie (about Jim Morris) tonight (about four years after I watched it the first time).

I was struck about how it plays on common movie themes — the need for the protagonist to be validated by his spouse and father.

This is a pathetic need if you give in to it. You don’t need others to validate you. You can validate yourself by making the right decisions (or making peace with paying the price for bad decisions).

Over the past 15 years, I’ve often had nobody to validate my most important decisions.

I can’t think of anybody close to me who told me the following were the valid decisions:

* To convert to Judaism. This came solely from within myself.

* To use singles ads in Jewish publications in 1992, 1993 to meet girls to help me recover from CFS

* To abandon shomer negiya (not touching the opposite sex) and start sleeping with women in 1993

Read On